College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

OPINION: 'Loveology' event a step backwards

Published: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, March 2, 2010

After last semester’s “dating terminology” e-mail fiasco, in which several ASWU members endorsed the message that we males should “man up” and initiate more dates, I had hoped the “Loveology” event hosted Feb. 13 would bring balance and serve as a mea culpa for those members who wrote said e-mail.

I was wrong.

Pastor John Mark Comer’s podcast message that evening was about the elements that compose a godly relationship. I walked in as he bluntly asserted, “It’s the man’s job to pursue the relationship.” Surprised and second-guessing what I was hearing, I was disappointed to hear him continually reinforce his message that it is the blessed responsibility of males to initiate and pursue all romantic relationships. As if men don’t want to be pursued, too?

Even more disturbing were Comer’s underlying assumptions about gender roles. It is the man’s job to pursue all parts of the relationship, even to the extreme that Comer’s now-wife would not call him for the first year they dated. What does that say about his view of women and their ability to self-determine and initiate relationships independent of a man’s provocation?

Comer was at least practical with his advice, however. “God’s answer for those of you couples struggling with purity: get married,” he said. For Comer, Christian relationships should have direction. “You either need to break up with your girlfriend, or you need to marry her.” (Notice Comer directs this choice to the men in the audience.)

And for those of us wondering what to do if our relationships are not moving toward marriage, Comer recommends the men go home and immediately call their girlfriends to say, “Honey, you’re Delilah” and break up. The implication is that the dating phase of relationships should be as quick as possible, because dating leads to lust and immorality. God have mercy on those of us who have crossed the line of holding hands with a significant other.

I’ve been told that the divorce rate among Whitworth graduates is noticeably higher than the national average. I will not speculate as to the reasons for this trend. But certainly the hasty “ring by spring” attitude doesn’t help cultivate healthy, well-developed relationships. I do not say this intending to criticize the application of Christian values and principles to romantic relationships.

Of course boundaries are healthy for relationships, and talking together through issues of sexuality and faith are probably better than the man dictating the terms of the relationship. I simply believe Comer’s approach is extremist and damaging for the progress of gender equality. I agree that Whitworth’s dating culture could use a facelift.

But the notion that the fast track to marriage is the solution to sin is just plain ridiculous, and promoting it through programs like the “Loveology” screening is embarrassing for our student government’s reputation.

Send comments to editor@whitworthian.com.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Peter Labberton
Tue Mar 9 2010 15:30
I really wish whitworthian.com would prevent those who comment here from simply identifying as anonymous -- people like the first commenter would be accountable for the hurtful, close-minded, reactionary remarks in the first post on this story. "His most prized possession," who "is to be submissive to her husband"? Really? Indeed, "gender roles be damned," anonymous commenter number two! It should be plainly obvious that a great deal of the prescriptions in The Bible simply don't apply to modern life; are you going to stone a woman on her wedding day if she is found to not be a virgin (Deuteronomy 22:20-21)? Didn't think so. So how about we all just take a step back and consider what The Bible has to say today, in this context. (Not that I think these ignorant gender roles were ever applicable, or anything but exactly as stupid as they are today.) Taking The Bible literally is not only foolish -- and, frankly, impossible -- but is also dangerous.

Comer's views on marriage and dating are ridiculous. Marriage is not something to jump into (especially if the reason is that you really just want to have sex and you are depriving yourself outside of marriage, which I suspect is the reason for far too many young couples getting married), and dating isn't something that should ever be looked at this way. To say that the dating process should be about determining whether or not to get married as quickly as possible is to promote extremely unhealthy marriages with a very low life expectancy.

Women's Lib
Fri Mar 5 2010 14:35
Dear anonymous #3. I feel like an idiot. All this time I thought 'gender' implied different sex organs. Thank you for setting me straight. And also, for enlightening me in that whatever I do that does not fit my role must not be the person that God created me to be. I've truly been illuminated by your response. Oh, and thanks for calling me a possession. I feel like an iPod or new North Face jacket. I officially have a grip. Again, thanks for your guidance.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 3 2010 14:33
Saying that "gender roles are a Christian view that is stated in the bible" as support for an argument that women's lib "needs to get a grip" is narrow minded and short-sighted at best. Gender roles are culturally imposed and differ from culture to culture. The bible is full of stories that reflect a point in time, cultural norms, and a society that was different from our present time (for example the bible also says women should cover their heads, but this biblical reality isn't part of a majority of current Christian culture). To the first comment provided, gender implies indoor or outdoor plumbing- culture defines the role.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 3 2010 02:08
I hope you realize that Women are not possessions. they are not some kind of fancy painting you purchase to hang on your wall and brag to your friends about. furthermore, they are an equal part of the relationship. If they want to initiate something, then they should go ahead and do it. gender roles be damned. Are guys good at some things and women good at other things? perhaps, but that is not to say that a trend indicates a rule. A woman can be exceptionally good at things that are normally considered a "man's" thing, perhaps even better than most guys and vice versa.

I would also like to say that the pastor's approach to marriage and dating is incredibly short sighted. If an individual or even a couple struggles with issues of sin, then they need to talk about it and talk to people they trust to sort things out and try to find a strategy that works for them. breaking up immediately can prematurely end something that could be an incredible learning experience (who knows, that person could change your life!). So with this in mind, that leaves us with the only choice (according to the pastor): marry her.

This is irresponsible. Marriage is not some quick arrangement made when you like a girl but you're struggling to deal with sin. It's supposed to be a serious commitment made out of love to the person whom you understand, love, and respect deeply. Marriage should be something that is proposed to someone after you've had a chance to get to know them for who they really are, and after understanding all the changes it will bring to your life as well as his/hers. To shorten the dating process as much as possible is to ask for disaster. I agree with you Tyler, you've got the right idea.

Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 20:44
Gender does imply a role. Women's Lib needs to get a grip! Gender roles are a Christian view that is clearly stated over and over in the Bible. We need to honor those roles and realize there are things that men are just plain good at and there are things women are good at. Rather than continually trying to pull the wool over our own eyes and say we are all equal in everything we do we need to embrace those things that make us special and quit yearning to be someone other than the person the Lord gifted us to be!

A man is the head of a house (as Christ is the head of the Church) and should fulfill those duties whole-heartedly and a wife is to be submissive to her husband, his most prized possession. Additionally, a man is required to be kind, respectful and loving to his wife. And, in that situation (a relationship/marriage) that honors the Lord we will have all the freedom we need to grow, love, mature, etc. to be the man or woman of God that we are intended to be. Why not initiate this structure in dating? A man should do the asking!







log out